SoccerSTATS.com back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG LOGIN
latvia
Latvia - Virsliga
LATEST MATCHES FORM TABLES HEAD-TO-HEAD GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE STATS
🔍

RFS vs Tukums

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  Riga FC 24 61
2  RFS 24 58
3  Liepaja 25 41
4  Auda 24 37
5  Daugavpils 25 34
6  FS Jelgava 25 27
7  Super Nova 25 23
8  Tukums 24 21
9  Grobina 24 20
10  Metta 24 17

 
Sat 26 Jul 2025
RFS6 2Tukums
Darko Lemajic (26) 1:0
1:1 Bogdans Samoilovs (33)
J. Porsan-Clemente (37) 2:1
2:2 Ingars Pulis (42)
Darko Lemajic (45) 3:2
Darko Lemajic (50) 4:2
Mor Talla Gaye (54) 5:2
Janis Ikaunieks (90) 6:2






Seasonal streaks


6th consecutive win for RFS.
8th consecutive home win for RFS.
2nd consecutive away defeat for Tukums.
15th consecutive game where RFS scored.
8th consecutive home game where RFS scored.
3rd consecutive game where Tukums conceded.
2nd consecutive away game where Tukums conceded.
2nd consecutive game where Tukums scored.
2nd consecutive home game where RFS conceded.
 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
RFS (57)Level (33)Tukums
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.


Outcome Surprise-Level

Points Per Game (before the match)
RFS
at home
Tukums
away
Total
2.730.673.39


OutcomeOutcome surprise-level
(any scoreline)(Losing team PPG / Total) * 100
Home win
19.6
Scale: from 0 (less surprising) to 100 (more surprising)

Outcome Surprise-levels

More information on the calculation of the Outcome surprise-level is outlined in the following blog article:
Evaluating surprising results







 






 flag

Rigas FS

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 12 11 0 1  
  Away 12 8 1 3  
  Total 24 19 1 4  
PPG (Home): 2.75
PPG (Away): 2.08
PPG (Total): 2.42

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game2.42 2.63 +8.7%
AVG Goals For2.63 3.00 +14.1%
AVG Goals Against0.92 1.00 +8.7%



RFS' progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
5 Mar Auda 1 - 2

     0-1   Niks Sliede (1)

     0-2   Darko Lemajic (14)

---------------------------------------
1-2   Matheus Clemente (58)
RFS + - - 0-2 stats
11 Mar RFS 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Darko Lemajic (90)
FS Jelgava - + - 0-0 stats
15 Mar Daugavpils 1 - 2

     0-1   Žiga Lipušcek (32)

     0-2   Darko Lemajic (39)

---------------------------------------
1-2   Maksims Kopilovs (73)
RFS + - - 0-2 stats
29 Mar RFS 4 - 1

     0-1   Djibril Gueye (11)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Yukiyoshi Karashima (47)

2-1   Darko Lemajic (48)

3-1   Janis Ikaunieks (54)

4-1   Lasha Odisharia (88)
Liepaja + - - 0-1 stats
4 Apr Metta 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Rudolfs Klavinskis (54)
RFS - - + 0-0 stats
9 Apr RFS 2 - 0

1-0   J. Porsan-Clemente (28)

2-0   Stefan Panic (45) pen.

Tukums - + - 2-0 stats
15 Apr Grobina 1 - 4

     0-1   Žiga Lipušcek (9)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Mor Talla Gaye (57)

1-2   Arwin Javad (69)

     1-3   J. Porsan-Clemente (74)

     1-4   Stefan Panic (84) pen.
RFS + - - 0-1 stats
20 Apr Super Nova 1 - 2

     0-1   Darko Lemajic (7)

1-1   Ralfs Šitjakovs (45)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   A. Kouadio (65)
RFS + - - 1-1 stats
26 Apr RFS 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Orlando Galo (81)
Riga FC - - + 0-0 stats
1 May RFS 1 - 0

1-0   Darko Lemajic (39)

Auda - + - 1-0 stats
5 May FS Jelgava 2 - 2

---------------------------------------
1-0   K. Emenike (76)

     1-1   Elvis Stuglis (83)

     1-2   Elvis Stuglis (84)

2-2   Arturs Janovskis (90)
RFS + - - 0-0 stats
9 May RFS 5 - 1

1-0   Darko Lemajic (12)

2-0   Darko Lemajic (16)

---------------------------------------
3-0   Darko Lemajic (62)

4-0   Mor Talla Gaye (71)

     4-1   Barthelemy Diedhiou (87)

5-1   Mor Talla Gaye (88)
Daugavpils + - - 2-0 stats
14 May Liepaja 2 - 1

1-0   Bruno Melnis (16)

     1-1   Mor Talla Gaye (24)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Joseph Oloko Ede (47)
RFS + - - 1-1 stats
20 May RFS 2 - 0

1-0   Dmitrijs Zelenkovs (3)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Stefan Panic (48)
Metta - + - 1-0 stats
25 May Tukums 2 - 5

     0-1   Darko Lemajic (26)

     0-2   Mor Talla Gaye (37)

     0-3   Yukiyoshi Karashima (45)

---------------------------------------
1-3   Arturs Krancmanis (50)

2-3   Bogdans Samoilovs (52)

     2-4   Darko Lemajic (68)

     2-5   Janis Ikaunieks (90)
RFS + - - 0-3 stats
31 May RFS 6 - 0

1-0   Darko Lemajic (6)

2-0   Janis Ikaunieks (12)

3-0   Janis Ikaunieks (19)

4-0   Elvis Stuglis (33)

---------------------------------------
5-0   Dmitrijs Zelenkovs (47)

6-0   Darko Lemajic (90)
Grobina + + - 4-0 stats
14 Jun RFS 2 - 1

     0-1   Ryuga Nakamura (7)

1-1   Mor Talla Gaye (32)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Darko Lemajic (90)
Super Nova + - - 1-1 stats
18 Jun Riga FC 3 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Janis Ikaunieks (51)

1-1   Ahmed Ankrah (54)

2-1   Marko Regža (88)

3-1   Ahmed Ankrah (90)
RFS + - - 0-0 stats
22 Jun RFS 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Petr Mareš (71)
Auda - + - 0-0 stats
26 Jun FS Jelgava 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Janis Ikaunieks (56)
RFS - + - 0-0 stats
30 Jun Daugavpils 1 - 7

1-0   Maksims Kopilovs (6)

     1-1   Herdi Prenga (13)

     1-2   J. Porsan-Clemente (17)

---------------------------------------
     1-3   Yukiyoshi Karashima (54)

     1-4   Darko Lemajic (56)

     1-5   Janis Ikaunieks (59)

     1-6   Darko Lemajic (65)

     1-7   Roberts Melkis (75)
RFS + - - 1-2 stats
4 Jul RFS 2 - 1

1-0   Stefan Panic (45)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Darko Lemajic (63)

     2-1   Djibril Gueye (90)
Liepaja + - - 1-0 stats
19 Jul Metta 0 - 4

     0-1   Janis Ikaunieks (10)

     0-2   Stefan Panic (30) pen.

---------------------------------------
     0-3   Mor Talla Gaye (65)

     0-4   Darko Lemajic (77)
RFS + + - 0-2 stats
26 Jul RFS 6 - 2

1-0   Darko Lemajic (26)

     1-1   Bogdans Samoilovs (33)

2-1   J. Porsan-Clemente (37)

     2-2   Ingars Pulis (42)

3-2   Darko Lemajic (45)

---------------------------------------
4-2   Darko Lemajic (50)

5-2   Mor Talla Gaye (54)

6-2   Janis Ikaunieks (90)
Tukums + - - 3-2 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
3 Aug Grobina h2h RFS 1.27 2.08
10 Aug RFS h2h Super Nova 2.75 0.64
24 Aug RFS h2h Riga FC 2.75 2.82
31 Aug Auda h2h RFS 1.83 2.08
13 Sep RFS h2h FS Jelgava 2.75 0.33
21 Sep RFS h2h Daugavpils 2.75 0.92
28 Sep Liepaja h2h RFS 1.92 2.08
5 Oct RFS h2h Metta 2.75 0.62
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.29

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins 836
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats ---
No win ---
No draw 12613
No defeat 836
1 goal scored or more 8915
1 goal conceded or more 2-1
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded -1-
GF+GA over 2.5 224
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice 224










Comparison with league average


RFS (24 matches) vs league average

(overall)RFS League AVG
Points per game  2.42 1.39
% Wins  79% 39%
% Draws  4% 22%
% Defeats  17% 39%
Goals scored per game  2.63 1.43
Goals conceded per game  0.92 1.43
% Clean sheets  33% 26%
% Failed To Score  8% 26%
% Won To Nil  33% 21%
% Lost To Nil  8% 21%
% Team scored first  71% 48%
% Opponent scored first  29% 48%
Average minute scored first  30 31
Average minute conceded first  36 31
Lead-defending rate  79% 65%
Equalizing rate  56% 35%
% Time leading  50% 27%
% Time level in goals  42% 45%
% Time trailing  8% 27%
PPG when scored first  2.82 2.25
PPG when conceded first  1.43 0.57
Total goals per game  3.54 2.87
% over 1.5 goals  75% 79%
% over 2.5 goals  67% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  42% 31%
% both teams scored  58% 52%

RFS at home (12 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)RFS League AVG
Points per game  2.75 1.70
% Wins  92% 49%
% Draws  0% 22%
% Defeats  8% 29%
Goals scored per game  2.67 1.64
Goals conceded per game  0.58 1.23
% Clean sheets  50% 36%
% Failed To Score  8% 16%
% Won To Nil  50% 31%
% Lost To Nil  8% 11%
% Team scored first  75% 52%
% Opponent scored first  25% 43%
Average minute scored first  36 32
Average minute conceded first  33 30
Lead-defending rate  85% 71%
Equalizing rate  67% 44%
% Time leading  49% 33%
% Time level in goals  45% 45%
% Time trailing  6% 22%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.47
PPG when conceded first  2.00 0.83
Total goals per game  3.25 2.87
% over 1.5 goals  67% 79%
% over 2.5 goals  50% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  33% 31%
% both teams scored  42% 52%

RFS away (12 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)RFS League AVG
Points per game  2.08 1.08
% Wins  67% 29%
% Draws  8% 22%
% Defeats  25% 49%
Goals scored per game  2.58 1.23
Goals conceded per game  1.25 1.64
% Clean sheets  17% 16%
% Failed To Score  8% 36%
% Won To Nil  17% 11%
% Lost To Nil  8% 31%
% Team scored first  67% 43%
% Opponent scored first  33% 52%
Average minute scored first  24 30
Average minute conceded first  38 32
Lead-defending rate  73% 56%
Equalizing rate  50% 29%
% Time leading  51% 22%
% Time level in goals  39% 45%
% Time trailing  10% 33%
PPG when scored first  2.63 1.98
PPG when conceded first  1.00 0.36
Total goals per game  3.83 2.87
% over 1.5 goals  83% 79%
% over 2.5 goals  83% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  50% 31%
% both teams scored  75% 52%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag RFS
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 17 / 24 71%
  Opponent scored first 7 / 24 29%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 13 / 24 54%
  Opponent was leading at HT 1 / 24 4%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 44.8 min. 50%
  Average minutes level in goals 38.0 min. 42%
  Average minutes trailing 7.2 min. 8%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Rigas FS have been in the lead for an average duration of 44.8 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 7.2 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag RFS
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 24

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 24
  Equalizer goals conceded 5
  Lead defending rate * (1) 79%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 9
  Equalizer goals scored 5
  Equalizing rate * (2) 56%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 34
  Non-crucial goals conceded 8

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Rigas FS have taken the lead 24 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 79% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 21%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 9 times that RFS's opponents have taken the lead, RFS have managed to score an equalizer on 5 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 56%.


 flag RFS
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 9 / 12 75%
  Opponent scored first 3 / 12 25%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 7 / 12 58%
  Opponent was leading at HT 1 / 12 8%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 43.8 min. 49%
  Average minutes level in goals 40.4 min. 45%
  Average minutes trailing 5.8 min. 6%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, RFS have been in the lead for an average duration of 43.8 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 5.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag RFS
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 12

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 13
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 85%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 3
  Equalizer goals scored 2
  Equalizing rate * (2) 67%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 17
  Non-crucial goals conceded 2

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, RFS have taken the lead 13 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 85% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 15%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 3 times that RFS's opponents have taken the lead when RFS were playing at home, RFS have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 67%.



 flag RFS
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 8 / 12 67%
  Opponent scored first 4 / 12 33%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 6 / 12 50%
  Opponent was leading at HT 0 / 12 0%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 45.9 min. 51%
  Average minutes level in goals 35.5 min. 39%
  Average minutes trailing 8.6 min. 10%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, RFS have been in the lead for an average duration of 45.9 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 8.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag RFS
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 12

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 11
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 73%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 6
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 50%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 17
  Non-crucial goals conceded 6

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, RFS have taken the lead 11 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 73% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 27%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 6 times that RFS's opponents have taken the lead when RFS were playing away, RFS have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 50%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Riga FC 24 61 0 - 1 3 - 1 h2h
   
2 RFS 24 58
3 Liepaja 25 41 4 - 1 2 - 1 h2h
2 - 1  
4 Auda 24 37 1 - 0 1 - 2 h2h
1 - 0  
5 Daugavpils 25 34 5 - 1 1 - 2 h2h
  1 - 7
6 FS Jelgava 25 27 1 - 0 2 - 2 h2h
  0 - 1
7 Super Nova 25 23 2 - 1 1 - 2 h2h
   
8 Tukums 24 21 2 - 0 2 - 5 h2h
6 - 2  
9 Grobina 24 20 6 - 0 1 - 4 h2h
   
10 Metta 24 17 2 - 0 1 - 0 h2h
  0 - 4

RFS stats rank the team in 2nd position in the Latvia - Virsliga table with 58 points, 3 points behind Riga FC and 17 points above Liepaja. The above table shows RFS results against each league opponent. The tables below provide additional statistics regarding RFS's season in the Latvian league.








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 32 3163
GF per match 2.672.58 2.63
Goals conceded (GA) 71522
GA per match 0.581.25 0.92
GF + GA per match 3.253.833.54
GF+GA over 0.5 100%100%100%
GF+GA over 1.5 67%83%75%
GF+GA over 2.5 50%83%67%
GF+GA over 3.5 33%50%42%
GF+GA over 4.5 33%25%29%
GF+GA over 5.5 25%17%21%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 75%67%71%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 42%58%50%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 17%17%17%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 50%17%33%
Won-to-nil 50%17%33%
Failed to score 8%8%8%
Lost-to-nil 8%8%8%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 92%92%92%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 67%67%67%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 75%67%71%
Scored in both halves 50%42%46%
Both teams scored 42%75%58%
Conceding Rate 50%83%67%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 25%25%25%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 25%67%46%
Conceded in both halves 0%8%4%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 92%92%92%
GF over 1.5 67%67%67%
GF over 2.5 33%33%33%
GF over 3.5 33%33%33%
GF over 4.5 25%17%21%
GA over 0.5 50%83%67%
GA over 1.5 8%33%21%
GA over 2.5 0%8%4%
GA over 3.5 0%0%0%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in RFS matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 0%0%0%
Match total goals = 1 33%17%25%
Match total goals = 2 17%0%8%
Match total goals = 3 17%33%25%
Match total goals = 4 0%25%12%
Match total goals = 5+ 33%25%29%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 33%17%25%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 33%33%33%
Match total goals = 4+ 33%50%42%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  52 13
Away wins  40 22
Home & Away wins  92 35
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  10 00
Away defeats  21 00
Home & Away defeats  31 00

A majority of RFS' wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (10 wins), while 9 of their wins had a one-goal margin.

A majority of RFS' defeats had a one-goal margin (3 defeats), while 1 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 57%
43%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)2.75
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)2.08
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 51%
49%
  % Goals conceded 32%
68%
  League average 57%
43%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 76 13  54%
Drawing at HT 46 10  42%
Losing at HT 10 1  4%
  Total 121224







Goal times


 flag RFS
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 10
GA 3
16-30 GF 8
GA 1
31-45 GF 11
GA 3
46-60 GF 13
GA 6
61-75 GF 10
GA 2
76-90 GF 11
GA 7
1st Half GF 29
46%
GA 7
32%
2nd Half GF 34
54%
GA 15
68%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 48
 Avg. minute goals conceded 55


  RFS
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 4
GA 2
16-30 GF 4
GA 0
31-45 GF 7
GA 2
46-60 GF 7
GA 0
61-75 GF 4
GA 0
76-90 GF 6
GA 3
1st Half GF 15
47%
GA 4
57%
2nd Half GF 17
53%
GA 3
43%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 48
  Avg. minute goals conceded 50


  RFS
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 6
GA 1
16-30 GF 4
GA 1
31-45 GF 4
GA 1
46-60 GF 6
GA 6
61-75 GF 6
GA 2
76-90 GF 5
GA 4
1st Half GF 14
45%
GA 3
20%
2nd Half GF 17
55%
GA 12
80%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 47
  Avg. minute goals conceded 58








RFS scores

FT at home
1-0 3 25%
2-1 2 17%
2-0 2 17%
6-2 1 8%
6-0 1 8%
5-1 1 8%
4-1 1 8%
0-1 1 8%
FT away
1-2 3 25%
2-5 1 8%
Other scores 1 8%
1-4 1 8%
0-4 1 8%
2-2 1 8%
3-1 1 8%
2-1 1 8%
0-1 1 8%
1-0 1 8%
The RFS score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (3 times). The RFS score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-2 so far (3 times).
Half-time at home
1-0 3 25%
0-0 3 25%
2-0 2 17%
3-2 1 8%
1-1 1 8%
0-1 1 8%
4-0 1 8%
Half-time away
0-0 4 33%
0-2 3 25%
1-1 2 17%
0-3 1 8%
1-2 1 8%
0-1 1 8%





This season in the league
RFS have won 19 of their 24 matches. RFS have won 11 of their 12 home matches. RFS have won 8 of their 12 away matches. RFS have won their last 6 matches. RFS have been undefeated in their last 6 matches. RFS have scored in each of their last 15 matches. RFS have scored in 11 of their 12 home matches. RFS have scored in 11 of their 12 away matches. RFS have scored the opening goal in 17 of their 24 matches. RFS have won their last 8 home matches. RFS have won their last 3 away matches. RFS have been undefeated in their last 8 home matches. RFS have scored in each of their last 9 away matches. RFS have scored 2 goals or more in each of their last 4 matches.


 flag

Tukums

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 11 3 4 4  
  Away 13 2 2 9  
  Total 24 5 6 13  
PPG (Home): 1.18
PPG (Away): 0.62
PPG (Total): 0.88

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game0.88 1.25 +42.0%
AVG Goals For1.13 1.63 +44.2%
AVG Goals Against1.96 2.13 +8.7%



Tukums' progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
7 Mar Daugavpils 3 - 0

1-0   Davis Cucurs (27)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Davis Cucurs (64)

3-0   Glebs Mihalcovs (85)
Tukums + - + 1-0 stats
12 Mar Liepaja 0 - 0

Tukums - + + 0-0 stats
16 Mar Metta 3 - 2

     0-1   Niks Dusalijevs (12)

1-1   Kristofers Rekis (16)

     1-2   Raivis Kirss (43)

---------------------------------------
2-2   Markuss Ivulans (53)

3-2   Emils Evelons (60)
Tukums + - - 1-2 stats
31 Mar Tukums 2 - 2

     0-1   Ruslans Deružinskis (23)

1-1   Ingars Pulis (37)

2-1   Ingars Pulis (42)

---------------------------------------
     2-2   Jevgenijs Minins (76) pen.
Super Nova + - - 2-1 stats
5 Apr Tukums 2 - 0

1-0   Niks Dusalijevs (4)

2-0   Ingars Pulis (8) pen.

Grobina - + - 2-0 stats
9 Apr RFS 2 - 0

1-0   J. Porsan-Clemente (28)

2-0   Stefan Panic (45) pen.

Tukums - - + 2-0 stats
13 Apr Tukums 0 - 3

     0-1   Anthony Contreras (27)

     0-2   Reginaldo Ramires (40)

---------------------------------------
     0-3   Eduards Daskevics (71)
Riga FC + - + 0-2 stats
18 Apr Auda 2 - 0

1-0   Matheus Clemente (24)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Steevenson Jeudy (51)
Tukums - - + 1-0 stats
23 Apr FS Jelgava 2 - 1

     0-1   Ingars Pulis (27)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Rihards Becers (83)

2-1   Rihards Becers (85)
Tukums + - - 0-1 stats
30 Apr Tukums 0 - 0

Daugavpils - + + 0-0 stats
6 May Tukums 2 - 2

1-0   Niks Dusalijevs (16)

     1-1   Bruno Melnis (28)

2-1   Ingars Pulis (45)

---------------------------------------
     2-2   Kyvon Leidsman (77)
Liepaja + - - 2-1 stats
11 May Tukums 2 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Ingars Pulis (52)

2-0   C. Kouoh (84)
Metta - + - 0-0 stats
16 May Super Nova 1 - 1

     0-1   Ingars Pulis (43)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Ryuga Nakamura (82) pen.
Tukums - - - 0-1 stats
21 May Grobina 2 - 0

1-0   Devids Dobrecovs (31) pen.

---------------------------------------
2-0   Olgerts Rascevskis (79)
Tukums - - + 1-0 stats
25 May Tukums 2 - 5

     0-1   Darko Lemajic (26)

     0-2   Mor Talla Gaye (37)

     0-3   Yukiyoshi Karashima (45)

---------------------------------------
1-3   Arturs Krancmanis (50)

2-3   Bogdans Samoilovs (52)

     2-4   Darko Lemajic (68)

     2-5   Janis Ikaunieks (90)
RFS + - - 0-3 stats
31 May Riga FC 3 - 0

1-0   Joao Grimaldo (8)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Reginaldo Ramires (53)

3-0   Orlando Galo (90)
Tukums + - + 1-0 stats
13 Jun Tukums 2 - 4

1-0   Niks Dusalijevs (9)

     1-1   Oskars Rubenis (20)

     1-2   Kemelho Nguena (36)

---------------------------------------
     1-3   Kemelho Nguena (50) pen.

2-3   Raivis Kirss (68)

     2-4   Kemelho Nguena (71) pen.
Auda + - - 1-2 stats
17 Jun Tukums 1 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   V. Promise (50)

1-1   Ingars Pulis (85)
FS Jelgava - - - 0-0 stats
21 Jun Daugavpils 1 - 2

     0-1   Rudolfs Reingolcs (40)

     0-2   Ingars Pulis (45) pen.

---------------------------------------
1-2   Raivis Skrebels (90)
Tukums + - - 0-2 stats
25 Jun Tukums 1 - 3

     0-1   Kirils Iljins (14)

     0-2   Danila Patijcuks (27)

---------------------------------------
1-2   Ingars Pulis (70)

     1-3   Djibril Gueye (90)
Liepaja + - - 0-2 stats
2 Jul Metta 0 - 3

     0-1   Ingars Pulis (33)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Maroine Mihoubi (86)

     0-3   C. Kouoh (89)
Tukums + + - 0-1 stats
6 Jul Super Nova 1 - 0

1-0   Ralfs Šitjakovs (15) pen.

Tukums - - + 1-0 stats
21 Jul Tukums 2 - 1

1-0   Ingars Pulis (45)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Devids Dobrecovs (71) pen.

2-1   Ingars Pulis (82)
Grobina + - - 1-0 stats
26 Jul RFS 6 - 2

1-0   Darko Lemajic (26)

     1-1   Bogdans Samoilovs (33)

2-1   J. Porsan-Clemente (37)

     2-2   Ingars Pulis (42)

3-2   Darko Lemajic (45)

---------------------------------------
4-2   Darko Lemajic (50)

5-2   Mor Talla Gaye (54)

6-2   Janis Ikaunieks (90)
Tukums + - - 3-2 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
3 Aug Tukums h2h Riga FC 1.18 2.82
10 Aug Tukums h2h Auda 1.18 1.25
23 Aug FS Jelgava h2h Tukums 1.77 0.62
30 Aug Tukums h2h Daugavpils 1.18 0.92
14 Sep Liepaja h2h Tukums 1.92 0.62
20 Sep Tukums h2h Metta 1.18 0.62
28 Sep Tukums h2h Super Nova 1.18 0.64
4 Oct Grobina h2h Tukums 1.27 0.62
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.40

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins 1--
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats -21
No win -21
No draw 266
No defeat 1--
1 goal scored or more 712
1 goal conceded or more 523
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 212
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice 112










Comparison with league average


Tukums (24 matches) vs league average

(overall)Tukums League AVG
Points per game  0.88 1.39
% Wins  21% 39%
% Draws  25% 22%
% Defeats  54% 39%
Goals scored per game  1.13 1.43
Goals conceded per game  1.96 1.43
% Clean sheets  21% 26%
% Failed To Score  38% 26%
% Won To Nil  12% 21%
% Lost To Nil  29% 21%
% Team scored first  42% 48%
% Opponent scored first  50% 48%
Average minute scored first  28 31
Average minute conceded first  25 31
Lead-defending rate  36% 65%
Equalizing rate  24% 35%
% Time leading  21% 27%
% Time level in goals  41% 45%
% Time trailing  37% 27%
PPG when scored first  1.70 2.25
PPG when conceded first  0.17 0.57
Total goals per game  3.08 2.87
% over 1.5 goals  88% 79%
% over 2.5 goals  58% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  29% 31%
% both teams scored  50% 52%

Tukums at home (11 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Tukums League AVG
Points per game  1.18 1.70
% Wins  27% 49%
% Draws  36% 22%
% Defeats  36% 29%
Goals scored per game  1.45 1.64
Goals conceded per game  1.91 1.23
% Clean sheets  27% 36%
% Failed To Score  18% 16%
% Won To Nil  18% 31%
% Lost To Nil  9% 11%
% Team scored first  45% 52%
% Opponent scored first  45% 43%
Average minute scored first  25 32
Average minute conceded first  28 30
Lead-defending rate  38% 71%
Equalizing rate  33% 44%
% Time leading  25% 33%
% Time level in goals  44% 45%
% Time trailing  31% 22%
PPG when scored first  2.00 2.47
PPG when conceded first  0.40 0.83
Total goals per game  3.36 2.87
% over 1.5 goals  91% 79%
% over 2.5 goals  64% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  45% 31%
% both teams scored  64% 52%

Tukums away (13 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Tukums League AVG
Points per game  0.62 1.08
% Wins  15% 29%
% Draws  15% 22%
% Defeats  69% 49%
Goals scored per game  0.85 1.23
Goals conceded per game  2.00 1.64
% Clean sheets  15% 16%
% Failed To Score  54% 36%
% Won To Nil  8% 11%
% Lost To Nil  46% 31%
% Team scored first  38% 43%
% Opponent scored first  54% 52%
Average minute scored first  31 30
Average minute conceded first  23 32
Lead-defending rate  33% 56%
Equalizing rate  18% 29%
% Time leading  18% 22%
% Time level in goals  39% 45%
% Time trailing  43% 33%
PPG when scored first  1.40 1.98
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.36
Total goals per game  2.85 2.87
% over 1.5 goals  85% 79%
% over 2.5 goals  54% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  15% 31%
% both teams scored  38% 52%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Tukums
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 10 / 24 42%
  Opponent scored first 12 / 24 50%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 9 / 24 38%
  Opponent was leading at HT 11 / 24 46%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 19.3 min. 21%
  Average minutes level in goals 37.2 min. 41%
  Average minutes trailing 33.5 min. 37%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tukums have been in the lead for an average duration of 19.3 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 33.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tukums
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 24

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 14
  Equalizer goals conceded 9
  Lead defending rate * (1) 36%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 17
  Equalizer goals scored 4
  Equalizing rate * (2) 24%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 9
  Non-crucial goals conceded 21

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Tukums have taken the lead 14 times and have conceded an equalizer on 9 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 36% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 64%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 17 times that Tukums's opponents have taken the lead, Tukums have managed to score an equalizer on 4 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 24%.


 flag Tukums
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 5 / 11 45%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 11 45%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 4 / 11 36%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 11 36%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 22.5 min. 25%
  Average minutes level in goals 39.7 min. 44%
  Average minutes trailing 27.8 min. 31%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tukums have been in the lead for an average duration of 22.5 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 27.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tukums
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 11

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 8
  Equalizer goals conceded 5
  Lead defending rate * (1) 38%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 6
  Equalizer goals scored 2
  Equalizing rate * (2) 33%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 6
  Non-crucial goals conceded 10

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Tukums have taken the lead 8 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 38% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 62%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 6 times that Tukums's opponents have taken the lead when Tukums were playing at home, Tukums have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 33%.



 flag Tukums
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 5 / 13 38%
  Opponent scored first 7 / 13 54%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 5 / 13 38%
  Opponent was leading at HT 7 / 13 54%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 16.6 min. 18%
  Average minutes level in goals 35.0 min. 39%
  Average minutes trailing 38.4 min. 43%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tukums have been in the lead for an average duration of 16.6 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 38.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tukums
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 13

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 6
  Equalizer goals conceded 4
  Lead defending rate * (1) 33%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 11
  Equalizer goals scored 2
  Equalizing rate * (2) 18%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 3
  Non-crucial goals conceded 11

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Tukums have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 11 times that Tukums's opponents have taken the lead when Tukums were playing away, Tukums have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 18%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Riga FC 24 61 0 - 3 3 - 0 h2h
   
2 RFS 24 58 2 - 5 2 - 0 h2h
  6 - 2
3 Liepaja 25 41 2 - 2 0 - 0 h2h
1 - 3  
4 Auda 24 37 2 - 4 2 - 0 h2h
   
5 Daugavpils 25 34 0 - 0 3 - 0 h2h
  1 - 2
6 FS Jelgava 25 27 1 - 1 2 - 1 h2h
   
7 Super Nova 25 23 2 - 2 1 - 1 h2h
  1 - 0
8 Tukums 24 21
9 Grobina 24 20 2 - 0 2 - 0 h2h
2 - 1  
10 Metta 24 17 2 - 0 3 - 2 h2h
  0 - 3

Tukums stats rank the team in 8th position in the Latvia - Virsliga table with 21 points, 2 points behind Super Nova and 1 point above Grobina. The above table shows Tukums results against each league opponent. The tables below provide additional statistics regarding Tukums's season in the Latvian league.








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 16 1127
GF per match 1.450.85 1.13
Goals conceded (GA) 212647
GA per match 1.912.00 1.96
GF + GA per match 3.362.853.08
GF+GA over 0.5 91%92%92%
GF+GA over 1.5 91%85%88%
GF+GA over 2.5 64%54%58%
GF+GA over 3.5 45%15%29%
GF+GA over 4.5 18%15%17%
GF+GA over 5.5 18%8%12%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 73%92%83%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 64%31%46%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 36%15%25%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 27%15%21%
Won-to-nil 18%8%12%
Failed to score 18%54%38%
Lost-to-nil 9%46%29%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 82%46%62%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 45%46%46%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 55%8%29%
Scored in both halves 18%8%12%
Both teams scored 64%38%50%
Conceding Rate 73%85%79%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 55%62%58%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 73%69%71%
Conceded in both halves 55%46%50%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 82%46%62%
GF over 1.5 64%31%46%
GF over 2.5 0%8%4%
GF over 3.5 0%0%0%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 73%85%79%
GA over 1.5 55%62%58%
GA over 2.5 36%31%33%
GA over 3.5 18%8%12%
GA over 4.5 9%8%8%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Tukums matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 9%8%8%
Match total goals = 1 0%8%4%
Match total goals = 2 27%31%29%
Match total goals = 3 18%38%29%
Match total goals = 4 27%0%12%
Match total goals = 5+ 18%15%17%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 9%15%12%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 45%69%58%
Match total goals = 4+ 45%15%29%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  12 00
Away wins  10 10
Home & Away wins  22 10
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  02 20
Away defeats  33 21
Home & Away defeats  35 41

A majority of Tukums' wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (3 wins), while 2 of their wins had a one-goal margin.

A majority of Tukums' defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (10 defeats), while 3 of their defeats had a one-goal margin.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 62%
38%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.18
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)0.62
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 59%
41%
  % Goals conceded 45%
55%
  League average 57%
43%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 45 9  38%
Drawing at HT 31 4  17%
Losing at HT 47 11  46%
  Total 111324







Goal times


 flag Tukums
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 4
GA 3
16-30 GF 2
GA 11
31-45 GF 11
GA 8
46-60 GF 3
GA 8
61-75 GF 2
GA 5
76-90 GF 5
GA 12
1st Half GF 17
63%
GA 22
47%
2nd Half GF 10
37%
GA 25
53%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 46
 Avg. minute goals conceded 51


  Tukums
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 3
GA 1
16-30 GF 1
GA 6
31-45 GF 4
GA 4
46-60 GF 3
GA 2
61-75 GF 2
GA 4
76-90 GF 3
GA 4
1st Half GF 8
50%
GA 11
52%
2nd Half GF 8
50%
GA 10
48%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 47
  Avg. minute goals conceded 49


  Tukums
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 1
GA 2
16-30 GF 1
GA 5
31-45 GF 7
GA 4
46-60 GF 0
GA 6
61-75 GF 0
GA 1
76-90 GF 2
GA 8
1st Half GF 9
82%
GA 11
42%
2nd Half GF 2
18%
GA 15
58%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 45
  Avg. minute goals conceded 53








Tukums scores

FT at home
2-2 2 18%
2-0 2 18%
2-5 1 9%
2-4 1 9%
1-3 1 9%
0-3 1 9%
2-1 1 9%
1-1 1 9%
0-0 1 9%
FT away
2-0 3 23%
3-0 2 15%
6-2 1 8%
0-3 1 8%
3-2 1 8%
1-2 1 8%
2-1 1 8%
1-1 1 8%
1-0 1 8%
0-0 1 8%
The Tukums score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 2-0 so far (3 times).
Half-time at home
0-0 3 27%
0-2 2 18%
2-1 2 18%
0-3 1 9%
1-2 1 9%
2-0 1 9%
1-0 1 9%
Half-time away
1-0 5 38%
0-1 3 23%
3-2 1 8%
1-2 1 8%
0-2 1 8%
2-0 1 8%
0-0 1 8%





This season in the league
Tukums conceded at least one goal in 8 of their 11 home matches. Tukums have scored 63% of their goals in the first half. Tukums have lost 9 of their 13 away matches. Tukums failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 5 home matches.








Tables overview

Points

GP pts
Riga FC 24 61
RFS 24 58
Liepaja 25 41
Auda 24 37
Daugavpils 25 34
FS Jelgava 25 27
Super Nova 25 23
Tukums 24 21
Grobina 24 20
Metta 24 17

Form (last 8)

GP pts
Riga FC 8 22
RFS 8 21
Liepaja 8 18
Auda 8 12
Daugavpils 8 12
Tukums 8 10
Super Nova 8 6
Metta 8 5
Grobina 8 4
FS Jelgava 8 4

Home

GP pts
RFS 12 33
Riga FC 13 30
Liepaja 13 25
FS Jelgava 13 23
Auda 12 22
Daugavpils 12 22
Super Nova 14 16
Grobina 11 14
Tukums 11 13
Metta 11 9

Away

GP pts
Riga FC 11 31
RFS 12 25
Liepaja 12 16
Auda 12 15
Daugavpils 13 12
Tukums 13 8
Metta 13 8
Super Nova 11 7
Grobina 13 6
FS Jelgava 12 4

Offence

GP GF
RFS 24 63
Riga FC 24 58
Liepaja 25 42
Daugavpils 25 37
Auda 24 34
Super Nova 25 27
Tukums 24 27
FS Jelgava 25 21
Grobina 24 21
Metta 24 20

Defence

GP GA
Riga FC 24 17
RFS 24 22
Auda 24 28
FS Jelgava 25 29
Super Nova 25 33
Liepaja 25 37
Daugavpils 25 43
Grobina 24 44
Tukums 24 47
Metta 24 50






Total Match Goals stats


Total match goals stats

Matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
RFS  24 3.54 100% 75% 67% 42% 29% 21% 58% 33% 8% 33% 8%
Daugavpils  25 3.20 96% 84% 56% 36% 28% 12% 72% 20% 12% 16% 8%
Liepaja  25 3.16 92% 80% 60% 44% 24% 12% 56% 32% 20% 24% 12%
Riga FC  24 3.13 100% 92% 58% 33% 17% 8% 50% 50% 0% 50% 0%
Tukums  24 3.08 92% 88% 58% 29% 17% 12% 50% 21% 38% 12% 29%
Metta  24 2.92 96% 79% 50% 38% 21% 8% 42% 12% 50% 8% 46%
Grobina  24 2.71 96% 79% 38% 25% 25% 8% 46% 21% 38% 17% 33%
Auda  24 2.58 96% 75% 46% 29% 8% 4% 50% 38% 17% 33% 12%
Super Nova  25 2.40 92% 76% 36% 24% 8% 4% 60% 20% 28% 12% 20%
FS Jelgava  25 2.00 92% 60% 32% 12% 4% 0% 40% 16% 52% 8% 44%
League average 95.1% 78.7% 50.0% 31.1% 18.0% 9.0% 52.5% 26.2% 26.2% 21.3% 21.3%

Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
RFS  8 4.00 100% 75% 75% 50% 25% 25% 62% 38% 0% 38% 0%
Daugavpils  8 3.75 100% 100% 62% 50% 25% 12% 88% 12% 0% 12% 0%
Tukums  8 3.75 100% 88% 75% 38% 25% 25% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
Riga FC  8 3.38 100% 100% 62% 50% 25% 0% 62% 38% 0% 38% 0%
Liepaja  8 3.00 100% 88% 62% 38% 12% 0% 62% 38% 0% 38% 0%
Auda  8 2.88 100% 75% 50% 38% 12% 12% 50% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Metta  8 2.88 100% 75% 62% 38% 12% 0% 50% 12% 38% 12% 38%
Grobina  8 2.13 88% 62% 38% 12% 12% 0% 38% 25% 50% 12% 38%
FS Jelgava  8 1.88 100% 62% 25% 0% 0% 0% 25% 12% 62% 12% 62%
Super Nova  8 1.63 88% 50% 12% 12% 0% 0% 38% 25% 50% 12% 38%
League average 97.5% 77.5% 52.5% 32.5% 15.0% 7.5% 55.0% 23.8% 23.8% 21.3% 21.3%

Total match goals stats (at home)

Home matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Tukums  11 3.36 91% 91% 64% 45% 18% 18% 64% 27% 18% 18% 9%
Daugavpils  12 3.25 100% 83% 58% 25% 25% 17% 58% 33% 8% 33% 8%
RFS  12 3.25 100% 67% 50% 33% 33% 25% 42% 50% 8% 50% 8%
Riga FC  13 2.85 100% 100% 54% 23% 8% 0% 46% 54% 0% 54% 0%
Auda  12 2.83 100% 92% 50% 33% 8% 0% 50% 50% 0% 50% 0%
Grobina  11 2.82 100% 82% 36% 27% 27% 9% 55% 27% 18% 27% 18%
Metta  11 2.82 91% 73% 55% 36% 18% 9% 36% 18% 55% 9% 45%
Liepaja  13 2.77 85% 69% 46% 38% 23% 8% 46% 54% 15% 38% 0%
FS Jelgava  13 2.46 100% 62% 54% 23% 8% 0% 62% 15% 23% 15% 23%
Super Nova  14 2.43 86% 71% 36% 29% 14% 7% 64% 29% 21% 14% 7%
League average 95.1% 78.7% 50.0% 31.1% 18.0% 9.0% 52.5% 36.1% 16.4% 31.1% 11.5%

Total match goals stats (away)

Away matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
RFS  12 3.83 100% 83% 83% 50% 25% 17% 75% 17% 8% 17% 8%
Liepaja  12 3.58 100% 92% 75% 50% 25% 17% 67% 8% 25% 8% 25%
Riga FC  11 3.45 100% 82% 64% 45% 27% 18% 55% 45% 0% 45% 0%
Daugavpils  13 3.15 92% 85% 54% 46% 31% 8% 85% 8% 15% 0% 8%
Metta  13 3.00 100% 85% 46% 38% 23% 8% 46% 8% 46% 8% 46%
Tukums  13 2.85 92% 85% 54% 15% 15% 8% 38% 15% 54% 8% 46%
Grobina  13 2.62 92% 77% 38% 23% 23% 8% 38% 15% 54% 8% 46%
Super Nova  11 2.36 100% 82% 36% 18% 0% 0% 55% 9% 36% 9% 36%
Auda  12 2.33 92% 58% 42% 25% 8% 8% 50% 25% 33% 17% 25%
FS Jelgava  12 1.50 83% 58% 8% 0% 0% 0% 17% 17% 83% 0% 67%
League average 95.1% 78.7% 50.0% 31.1% 18.0% 9.0% 52.5% 16.4% 36.1% 11.5% 31.1%




Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 61 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 11.8 pts from 11.9 to 24.1 pts from 24.2 to 36.4 pts from 36.5 to 48.7 pts from 48.8 to 61 pts
(25)  23  Super Nova
(24)  21  Tukums
(24)  20  Grobina
(24)  17  Metta
(25)  34  Daugavpils
(25)  27  FS Jelgava
(25)  41  Liepaja
(24)  37  Auda
(24)  61  Riga FC
(24)  58  RFS

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.








Sun 3 Aug
GRO - RFS
Sun 3 Aug
TUK - RFC
Sun 3 Aug
AUD - MET
Sat 9 Aug
LIE - DAU
Sat 9 Aug
MET - JEL
Sun 10 Aug
RFC - GRO
Sun 10 Aug
TUK - AUD
Sun 10 Aug
RFS - SUP




Latvia - Virsliga stats

122 matches played / 162
75.3% completed
Home wins:  49%
Over 1.5 goals:  79%
Draws:  22%
Over 2.5 goals:  50%
Away wins:  29%
Over 3.5 goals:  31%
Goals:  350 Home goals per match:  1.64
Goals per match:  2.87 Away goals per match:  1.23
    Both teams scored:  52%

Results

 Latest results
 Matches by date
 Matches by Matchweek
 Results grid
 Results filter
 Outcome Surprise-Levels

Tables

 Home / Away tables
 Wide table
 Tables by Date
 Form tables
 Projected points

Analysis

 Goals statistics
 Points performance
 Over / Under
 Scored / Conceded
 Home advantage
 Relative form
 Run-in analysis

Goal times

 When goals were scored
 1st-half / 2nd-half
 First team to score
 Goal types
 Lead durations
 Points Won/Lost
Home team scored first: 52% No goal scored: 5% Away team scored first: 43%
Average minute when home team scored first: 32 min. Average minute when away team scored first: 30 min.
Home team lead-defending rate: 71% Away team lead-defending rate: 56%
Home team equalizing rate: 44% Away team equalizing rate: 29%
Home team lead duration: 33% Teams level in goals: 45% Away team lead duration: 22%
Home PPG when home team scored first: 2.47 Away PPG when away team scored first: 1.98

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 122 matches played in the Latvian league, a total of 350 goals have been scored (2.87 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including Latvia - Virsliga results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Change consent
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options
Mobile app

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
   
Copyright 1998-2025 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top